Green initiatives in stimulus not enough
Green initiatives in stimulus act not enough
February 16, 6:38 PM
by Caroline Calais, Dallas Environmental Policy Examiner
Environmentalists have a great deal to be happy about when President Obama, tomorrow, signs the single most expensive economic legislation in U.S history into law. Of the stimulus act’s $789 billion, about $60 billion will be spent on alternative energy, scientific research and diverse environmental projects.
“For years US policymakers’ support for clean energy has been uneven”, said Michael Liebreich, chairman and CEO of the London based research firm New Energy Finance. “There have been successes such as the fast growth of wind power capacity in Texas, but there has also been a lack of consistency compared to leading European countries in providing the necessary national support for wind, solar, geothermal, and other new energy technologies”.
But even if environmentalists are jubilant about the green initiatives included in the bill, the investments might not be enough. Projections from the U.S Department of Energy show, for example, that worldwide energy demand will grow 50 percent between 2005- 2030. And since natural gas supplies seem to be stagnant, global availability of oil in decline, the result is a greater reliance on CO2 intensive coal.
“Even with a huge increase in spending on energy alternatives it is highly unlikely that renewable, advanced biofuels, and climate-safe coal will be available on large enough scale in 2030 to make up for what is likely to be an inadequate supply of oil and natural gas”, says Michael T. Klare, professor at Hampshire College and author of Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy, in this article Navigating the Energy Transition.
The consequence not only an increased geopolitical competition for energy supplies, but also a deteriorating environment. Participants in January’s World Economic Forum in Davos, concluded that clean energy investments of $515 billion per year is needed between now and 2030 for carbon emissions not to reach levels deemed unsustainable by scientists.
Special Report: Obama's First 100 Days
Exclusive examiner.com coverage of the Obama administration's promise to bring about change.
Examiner Coverage: First 100 Days
Vote now: What will Obama change most?
The Obama Administration at a glance
Examiner Coverage: inauguration day 2009
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Seriously, this is all starting to add up in some bad directions. $700 B TARP fund - blown. $50 M Automaker bailout - blown. $80 M AIG bailout - blown.
They haven't even trotted out the $2 T plus needed for the bank, lender and mortgage bailout which based on the track record will be - blown.
When it's all added up it is close to $1 M per US citizen. Ridiculous. Added to everyone's own personal debt.
What is now $1 M per US citizen should be GIVEN to each US citizen in percentages based on social security contributions over each person's lifetime. That way, I wouldn't be paying for a crack whore.
Do you know the government in Iceland has been OVERTHROWN because of the same thing.
The US government is throwing this money around to prevent us from taking to the streets and throwing their theiving asses out.
Who besides me has had enough?
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/16 @ 08:35 PM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/02/17 @ 02:51 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/02/17 @ 03:01 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/17 @ 03:33 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/17 @ 03:35 AM — (Reply)
notebook batteries
Comment by Siladitya Banerjee— 2009/03/29 @ 02:54 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/11/03 @ 10:07 AM — (Reply)
BG
Comment by Barry G.— 2009/11/03 @ 06:35 PM — (Reply)
Wholesale Ugg Boots
Comment by wholesale ugg boots— 2009/11/23 @ 07:23 AM — (Reply)