The Moral Hazard of Bailouts
The truth is that both parties are responsible for this mess; it didn’t happen over a day – not even over a presidential term or two. Technology innovation is partly to blame. The invention of the consumer credit was very much the culprit of the great Depression, kind of the same way as technological advances made it easier for lenders of sub-prime mortgages to assess pricing risks. But earlier bailouts is also to blame, it creates the problem of “moral hazard”.
In Sweden the problem of moral hazard and cheating is familiar one. It might not be that Swedish banks routinely issues” liar loans” like IndyMac Bank , or engage in deceptive advertising like GMAC Bank and other student loan companies, but Swedes cheat big time with their healthcare benefits. Economist Assar Lindbeck pointed out that, in 1980, when Swedes received 90-100 percent of their salary when sick, people stayed home about 26 days per year. In 1955, when the replacement ratio was lower, they stayed home 14 days. And this is Europe’s healthiest people we are talking about!
In the Swedish Welfare State the norm has changed from: do your duties claim your right, to claim your right. Sounds familiar? Kind of the same way wealthy Wall Street reacts to being rescued time and again.